Frye Opinion
Frye Opinion
Daubert
Daubert Overview
Daubert vs. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical
Syllabus Opinion Other
Post-Daubert Decisions Standard
Syllabus Concurrence Opinion Dissenting
Non-Science
Syllabus Concurrence Opinion Dissenting
Polygraph
Syllabus Concurrence Opinion Dissenting
Retrial
Syllabus Opinion

Daubert Definition of Scientific Evidence

Daubert vs. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Any scientific evidence, technique or methodology must meet the following criteria:

  1. it can be tested
  2. it is subject to peer review
  3. it possesses known rates of error
  4. it is generally accepted by the scientific community as science.

The Daubert Standard is a legal precedent set in 1993 by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony during legal proceedings. The citation is Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993).

A Daubert motion is a motion, raised before or during trial, to exclude the presentation of unqualified evidence to the jury. This is a special case of motion in limine, usually used to exclude the testimony of an expert witness who has no such expertise or used questionable methods to obtain the information.