Reference 01 Reference 02 Reference 03 Reference 04 Reference 05 Reference 06 Reference 07 Reference 08 Reference 09 Reference 10 Reference 11 Reference 12 Reference 13 Reference 14 Reference 15 Reference 16 Reference 17 Reference 18 Reference 19 Reference 20 Reference 21 Reference 22 Reference 23 Reference 24 Reference 25 Reference 26 Reference 27 Reference 28 Reference 29 Reference 30 Reference 31 Reference 32 Reference 33 Reference 34 Reference 35 Reference 36 Reference 37 Reference 38 Reference 39 Reference 40 Reference 41 Reference 42 Reference 43 Reference 44 Reference 45 Reference 46 Reference 47 Reference 48 Reference 49 Reference 51
Title: Classification and Identification of Modern Office Copiers
Author(s): James H. Kelly
Publisher: American Board of Forensic Document Examiners, Inc.
Reprints available for $15 from:
American Board of Forensic Document Examiners, Inc.
The Forensic Sciences Foundation, Inc.
225 South Academy Boulevard
Colorado Springs CO 80910
ISBN:
Library of Congress:

About the Author(s)

James H. Kelly is Chief Document Examiner for the Georgia State Crime Laboratory. His professional affiliations include membership in the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, the Southern Association of Forensic Sciences, and Diplomate of the American Board of Forensic Document Examiners. He is currently a member of the Executive Committee of the AAFS and President of the SAFS. In his 18 years in the field of document examination, Mr. Kelly has published many articles in the leading forensic science journals and has also lectured extensively on this subject.

Preface

This monograph is intended to be a guide for document examiners. It attempts to cover the examination of photocopiers for the purpose of discovering evidence that would assist in an investigation.

Information and physical facts are often contained on a copy that can be discovered and demonstrated. Techniques have been developed that will enable the examiner to make a thorough scientific examination. These techniques have been developed for the past twelve years. They have been tested and retested many times and are routinely used in the examinations. The courts have accepted testimony as in the majority of cases the result of the examination can be demonstrated.

This treatise is the first comprehensive treatment of the subject although other articles have been written.

  1. James H. Kelly, “Identifying the Copying Machine Used in Preparation of Simulated Forgeries,” Journal of Forensic Sciences 18 (1974) 410.
  2. James E. Lile and Anthony R. Blair, “Photocopiers: Classification and Identification (Progress Report),” Journal of Forensic Sciences 21 (1976) 923.
  3. Dan C. Purdy, “The Xerox 6500 Colour Copier,” Canadian Society of Forensic Sciences Journal 9 (1976) 117.
  4. Ordway Hilton, “Detecting Fraudulent Photocopies,” Forensic Science International 13 (1979) 117.
  5. R. N. Totty, J. M. Dubery, I. W. Evett and I. D. Renshaw, “X-Ray Microprobe Analysis of Coated Papers Used in Photocopying Processes,” Forensic Science International 13 (1979) 31.
  6. Jerry D. Kelly and Paula Haville, “Procedure for the Characterization of Zinc Oxide Photocopy Papers,” Journal of Forensic Sciences 25 (1980) 118.
  7. R. N. Totty and D. Baxendale, “Defect Marks and the Identification of Photocopying Machines,” Journal of The Forensic Science Society 21 (1981) 23.